Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Over Buffalo Wild Wings' Boneless Wings
In Brief
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit claiming Buffalo Wild Wings' boneless wings were falsely advertised.
Key Facts
- In 2023, a Chicago man filed a lawsuit against Buffalo Wild Wings alleging false advertising of boneless wings
- The lawsuit claimed that the term 'boneless wings' was deceptive marketing
- A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, stating the claim 'has no meat on its bones'
- Buffalo Wild Wings stated their boneless wings are made from all white meat chicken
- The judge responded to the lawsuit with a notable, humorous remark
What Happened
In 2023, a Chicago man filed a lawsuit against Buffalo Wild Wings alleging that the term 'boneless wings' was deceptive advertising. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that the claim lacked merit and stating it 'has no meat on its bones.' Buffalo Wild Wings confirmed their boneless wings are made from all white meat chicken.
Why It Matters
The dismissal highlights legal boundaries around food marketing terminology and consumer expectations. It may influence how restaurants label products that differ from traditional items but use familiar names. The case also illustrates judicial responses to lawsuits involving food marketing claims.
Sources
- NYT — Boneless Wings Are Still Wings, Judge Rules(1d ago)
- CBS News — Judge: Lawsuit against Buffalo Wild Wings has "no meat on its bones"(1d ago)
- CBS News — Judge delivers spicy response to lawsuit over Buffalo Wild Wings boneless wings(just now)
