Former Daily Mail Editor Denies Unlawful Hacking Allegations at Trial
In Brief
Paul Dacre rejects claims of illegal information gathering, says he ended such practices.
Key Facts
- Paul Dacre is the former editor of the Daily Mail newspaper
- He appeared in the High Court to respond to allegations of unlawful information gathering
- Dacre described the claims that Daily Mail staff gathered information unlawfully as 'preposterous' and 'inconceivable'
- He stated that he stopped the use of private investigators for newsgathering during his tenure
- Dacre said he put the 'shutters down' on unlawful newsgathering techniques at the Daily Mail
What Happened
Paul Dacre, former editor of the Daily Mail, appeared in the High Court to address allegations that the newspaper's staff engaged in unlawful information gathering. He denied these claims, calling them 'preposterous' and 'inconceivable'. Dacre also testified that he ended the use of private investigators and halted unlawful newsgathering practices during his leadership.
Why It Matters
The trial examines journalistic practices and ethics at a major UK newspaper, focusing on allegations of unlawful information gathering. Dacre's testimony provides insight into editorial decisions regarding newsgathering methods and the use of private investigators.
Sources
- BBC News — Former Daily Mail editor tells hacking trial allegations are 'preposterous'(1d ago)
- BBC News — Former Daily Mail editor tells trial he stopped use of private investigators(just now)
